JavaScript Book by David Flanagan, and the Man-made Complexity in Computer Language

Perm URL with updates:

Am very impressed with this book. VERY.

JavaScript Definitive Guide by David Flanagan
JavaScript Definitive Guide (6th ed.) By David Flanagan. @ amazon

Normally, if you've been programing for a few years, you can quickly start to program in a new lang. You just learn the basics, types, loops, list/array, function/objects, module, then you can practically code anything you want, albeit in a non-optimal way. But, you'll have a lot questions, especially with complex languages. Questions like scope, evaluation model, and the language's overall “model”. What happens if you do xyz. Understanding these makes you a true expert in that lang. To understand a lang well, is to be able to have a sense of a mathematical model of the language.

(and almost all modern langs are quite complex, including Java, Python, Ruby. Now, JavaScript is easy to use, but it turns out it's quite complex too actually, the hairy details of its prototype inheritance. Very few languages have simple models (Mathematica, Lisp, do)) (a language with a simple model, would be one that its syntax and semantics can be specified in just a handful of rules. (see: Formal language.) 〔☛ Math Notations, Computer Languages, and the “Form” in Formalism〕)

David Flanagan drills down on the real tech detail of JavaScript language.

I've only read parts of the chapters on JavaScript Objects, and the book is really good.

I noticed that he also wrote one on Ruby: 〔The Ruby Programming Language By David Flanagan. @…〕. Am looking forward to read this.

Actually, he wrote several others, on Java, on X11, since at least 1996.

The Cost of Complex Language

Most popular languages are exceedingly complex. The problem is that, you spend years to master them, but, new language comes out and replaces it, and the time you spend learning that language doesn't contribute your understanding to computer science or math in any way. What you learned is sometimes called “artificial complexity”, “man-made complexity”, unlike certain complexity in math or comp sci, that are inherent, unavoidable. Perl, C, C++, and unix tech (Shell, Apache) are good examples of man-made complexity. Lisp, in general, are the polar opposite.

Popular posts from this blog

11 Years of Writing About Emacs

does md5 creates more randomness?

Google Code shutting down, future of ErgoEmacs